Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Solace rejects Government proposals to reform the Human Rights Act 1998

The Ministry of Justice held a consultation on proposals to reform the Human Rights Act 1998 and replace it with a ‘modern bill of rights’. Solace submitted a response to this consultation, building on the work of the British Institute for Human Rights, Liberty, Women’s Aid and the Centre for Women’s Justice, rejecting the Government’s proposals on the grounds that they risk watering down, not strengthening, human rights. 

Acts of violence against women and girls are violations of human rights, and the Human Rights Act is an essential piece of legislation that helps to ensure justice for women and children experiencing violence. It provides a mechanism to hold institutions to account when they fail to keep women safe. The Human Rights Act has been instrumental in bringing cases against individual police forces when they have failed in domestic homicide, rape, and trafficking cases, requiring them to change the way they work in response to male violence against women and girls. 

In our response, we highlight particular concern over the Government’s proposal to address positive obligations to prevent public service priorities being ‘impacted by costly human rights legislation’. Services like Solace often rely on the positive obligations in the Human Rights Act in a preventative way by highlighting to public authorities their duties to women and children escaping abuse and preventing a case from reaching the courts.  

Any watering down of the current legislation could prevent women accessing justice, diminish the ability to hold public services accountable for their failures and prevent improvements being made in the way women and girls are protected.  

Read the full submission here:

Share this story: